Ne pas se fédérer avec gab n'est pas une atteinte à la liberté d'expression. Laisser les propos haineux se diffuser, c'est laisser des gens se faire opprimer. Dire aux gens que leurs propos de merde n'ont pas leur place chez nous c'est sauvegarder la parole précieuse des gens opprimés.
Cria cuervos. Te comer los ojos.
Ah bravo, belle moralité, empêcher de braves fafs haineux, stupides et méchants de t'exclure alors que c'est leur désir le plus cher.
> Who decides that an opinion is shitty ?
Everyone, indeed. Didn't you had shitty ones? I did. Several times. Their are not only shitty. They are harmful, on purpose. That's a problem for us. They try to install domination, it's their system of value. On our instance, it's a real matter. This has not to happen.
> What should happen to you when people will start thinking that your opinions are shitty ?
They might think so. They might argue. I'll start to think about it. I'm pretty sure they won't. The people we try to protect are voiceless.
Once again, don't try to convince me that privileged people are victims. They have not race, sexism or social issues.
I'm conscious about my privileges and don't want to use them as an argument for racism or oppression.
As we say in here "ouin ouin" is not an argument.
You tell shit then expect me to tell you to shut up or not listen to you. I'm pretty sure you would behave the same.
@mcread First I wanted to apologize for a previous message. I forgot a «if» at the beginning of my sentence which should have been:
«If you tell shit then expect me to tell you to shut up or not listen to you.»
This was a theorical example. Not an affirmation. Don't take it personnaly. Please if you've been hurt, forgive me. I was not meaning attacking you.
@mcread Yes it is bad. But at a certain point, some humans are clearly not looking for added value and positive influence. It is NOT the norm. It makes me sad too.
It is not about listening to our own voices. I'm a white male. I am priviledged. I want to be able to hear the voices of the unpriviledged. The blacks, women, trans, gays, not valids that might feel harrassed if we let a hord of racist, patriarchists, homophobic bullies come in here.
@mcread I don't want those peoples to flee and offer them a place to talk and discuss without being insulted or threatened. If I want to argue with nazis I'll find them easily. They are noisy enough.
@mcread here: toot.aquilenet.fr
«Not all of them are weirdos» sounds like «Not all men are agressors» which is the same defense line as masculinists. This is irrelevant.
@mcread I am NOT your brother and not even your friend. You are boring and your arguments are sophisms.
@mcread The other trick is the story like «Little Red Riding Hood» or the Trojan Horse. Pick one. Same methods.
As said before, «alt-right» peoples can cry about «free-speech». I'm not censoring them. You can here them everywhere. We don't want to hear them in our instance.
@mcread No. I admin this in my association. We (the admins) decided it. If users are not happy with it, they might move and deal with it.
Un réseau social montée par les ouinouins de l'extrême droite américaine, sous couvert de free-speech. Y a zéro modération, je te laisse imaginer l'ambiance.
Ben figure toi qu'ils ont integré activity pub et que le 4 juillet ils fédèrent.
Ben pas avec nous. Que ce soit dit.
@MicroCheapFx @Lapineige tout à fait d'accord !
Ou comme disait je ne sais plus qui de connu : la tolérance ne s'applique pas aux intolérants (ou qqch comme ça). Donc les logiciels doivent permettre aux utilisateurs et aux admins de se protéger *facilement*.
La limite à ne pas dépasser en ce qui me concerne : il ne faut pas que ce soit par défaut en dur dans le logiciel, cela doit rester une démarche volontaire et consciente.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!